Blasphemy!

It appears our friends in academia have been playing too much Grand Theft Auto:

The image of the crucifixion, one of the most powerful emblems of Christianity, may be quite erroneous, according to a study which says there is no evidence to prove Jesus was crucified in this manner. ...

Sometimes he was nailed to the cross by his genitals, sometimes the hands and feet were attached to the side of the cross and not the front, or affixed with cords rather than nails.

Why anyone would need to bring up Jesus' giblets in the course of a "scholarly" article is beyond me, but this sort of vulgarity has long been the calling card of liberalism. This is nothing more than another drive-by shooting by the assassins of The Left, with the intended victim being the credibility of The Church. Besides, everyone knows what the Crucifixion really looked like.